تأثیر عمل آوری شیمیایی مواد بستری بر کیفیت بستر، عملکرد رشد و وقوع جراحات پوستی لاشه جوجه های گوشتی

شناسنامه علمی شماره

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه پرورش و تولید طیور دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

2 استاد گروه پرورش و تولید طیور دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

3 استادیار گروه تکنولوژی تولیدات دامی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه لرستان

4 استادیار گروه پرورش و تولید طیور دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس

چکیده

این آزمایش با استفاده از 576 قطعه جوجه گوشتی نر و ماده (با نسبت مساوی) سویه آرین به صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل 4×2 در قالب طرح پایه کاملاً تصادفی با 3 تکرار انجام شد. فاکتورها شامل 2 ماده بستری خاک اره و کاه گندم و 4 ترکیب افزودنی مواد شیمیایی متشکل از: 1) سولفات آلومینیوم + آهک، 2) زئولیت طبیعی + اسید سیتریک، 3) ترکیبی از مواد شیمیایی فوق و 4) گروه شاهد (بدون افزودنی به بستر)، بود. در 42 روزگی عملکرد پرنده (وزن زنده، افزایش وزن، مصرف خوراک، ضریب تبدیل و درصد تلفات)، pH بستر، ابقای نیتروژن (درصد)، جمعیت باکتری های هوازی کل و اسید لاکتیکی بستر (cfu/g 1) تحت تأثیر معنی دار مواد بستری و مواد افزودنی شیمیایی و اثر متقابل نوع بستر × نوع افزودنی قرار نگرفت (05/0<P). درصد رطوبت بستر تحت تأثیر معنی دار مواد بستری قرار گرفت (05/0>P). درصد شیوع زخم های سینه و کف پا برای هر کدام از تیمارهای بستری و افزودنی غیر معنی دار و تنها درصد شیوع سوختگی مفصل خرگوشی تحت تأثیر معنی دار عمل آوری بستر قرار گرفت (05/0>P)، به طوری که استفاده از بستر خاک اره و عمل آوری بستر با مواد شیمیایی منجر به کاهش وقوع و شدت آن در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد شد.

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of adding chemical amendment to litter materials (sawdust and wheat straw) on litter quality, growth performance and incidence of carcass lesions in broiler

نویسندگان [English]

  • D Farhadi 1
  • F Shariatmadari 2
  • H Khosravinia 3
  • M.A Karimi. Torshiz 4
3 Assiatant Professor of Technology of Animal Products, Agricultural College, Lorestan University. Khoramabad
4 Assistant Professor of Poultry Science Dept, Agriculture College, Tarbiat Modares University, Tarbiat Modares University. Tehran. Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of litter chemical amendments on litter Quality, broiler performance and Carcass Lesions (breast blisters, foot pad lesions and hock burns). In a 2×4 factorial experiment with 576 commercial broiler chicks (Arian), the effect of two types of litter materials and three amendments were investigated using a completely randomized design with three replications and 24 day-old chicks in each pen. Litter material treatments were: 1) sawdust and 2) wheat straw. Litter amendment treatments were: 1) control (with no litter amendment), 2) alum + CaCO3, 3) natural zeolite + citric acid, 4) whole additives from 2 and 3 treatments. Litter materials and amendments and interaction between those did not have any effect on weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion, and mortality percentage in chicks and pH value, nitrogen retention (%), total plate counts and lactobacillus populations (cfu/g) in litter. Moisture percentage significantly affected by litter types (P>0.05). Incidence of breast blisters or footpad lesions were not significantly affected by litter materials and amendments. Incidence of hock burns significantly affected by litter chemical amendments (P>0.05), in a way that use of sawdust litter and chemical amendments resulted in decrease of incidence and severity of hock burn in broiler.

مراجع

1-       پوررضا، ج.، ادریس، م.ع.، خسروی نیا، ح. و آقایی، ع. ( 1383 ) اثر افزودنی های بستر جوجه های گوشتی بر خصوصیات شیمیائی و فیزیکی آن..163-170:(3) مجله علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی.  
2- Al-Homidan, A., Robertson, J.F. and Petchey, A.M. (2003)Review of the effect of ammonia and dust concentrations on broiler performance. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 59:340-349.
3- Anderson, D.P., Beard, C.W. and Hanson, R.P. (1964) The adverse effects of ammonia on chickens including resistance to infection with Newcastle disease virus. Avian Res. 8:369-373.
4- AOAC. (1994) Association of official analytical chemists.Official Methods of Analysis. Methods of Analysis. 16th ed.
AOAC, Washington, DC.
5- Atapattu, N.S.B.M. and Wickraramasinghe, K.P. (2007) The use of refused tea as litter material for broiler chickens. Poult.Sci. 86:968-972.
6- Bilgili, S., Montenegro, G.I., Hess, J.B. and Eckman, M.K.(1999) Sand as litter for rearing broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult.Res. 8:345-351.
7- Brake, D.J., Boyle, C.R., Chamblee, T.N., Schultz, C.D. and Peebles, E.D. (1992) Evaluation of the chemical and physical properties of hardwood bark used as a broiler litter material. Poult. Sci. 41:467-472.
8- Burgess, R.P., Carey, J.B. and Shafer, D.J. (1998) The impact of pH on nitrogen retention in laboratory analysis of broiler litter. Poult. Sci. 77:1620–1622.
9- Carlile, F.S. (1984) Ammonia in poultry houses. A literature review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 40:99–113.
10- Carter, T.A., Allison, R.C., Mills, W.C. and West, J.R. (1979) Wood chips for broiler litter. Poult. Sci. 58:994-997.
11- Caveny, D.D., Quarles, C.L. and Greathouse, G.A. (1981). Atmospheric ammonia and broiler cockerel performance. Poult. Sci. 60:513–516.
12- Choi, I.H. and Moore, Jr. P.A. (2008) Effects of liquid aluminum chloride additions to poultry litter on broiler
performance, ammonia emissions, soluble phosphorus, total volatile fatty acids, and nitrogen contents of litter. Poult. Sci. 87:1955-1963.
13- Davasgaium, M.M. and Boodoo A.A. (1997) Use of bagasse as a potential source of litter material for broiler production AMAS. Food and Agricultural Research Council, Reduit, Mauritius.
14- Do J.C., Choi, I.H. and Nahm, K.H. (2005). Effects of chemically amended litter on broiler performances, atmospheric ammonia concentration, and phosphorus solubility in litter. Poult. Sci. 84:679–686.
15- Elliott, H.A., Collins, N.E. (1982) Factors affecting ammonia release in broiler houses. Trans. ASAE. 25(2):413 424.
16- Grimes, J.L., Smith, J. and Williams, C.M. (2002) Some alternative litter materials used for growing broiler and turkeys. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 58:515-526.
17- Hester, P.Y., Sutton, A.L., Elkin, R.G. and Klingensmith, P.M. (1985) The effect of lighting, dietary amino acids and litter on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of turkey toms. Poult. Sci. 64:2062-2075.
18- Huff, W.E., Malone, G.W. and Chaloupka, G.W. (1984) Effect of litter treatment on broiler performance and certain litter quality parameters. Sci. 63:2167–2171.
19- Ivanov, I.E. (2001) Treatment of broiler litter with organic acids. Res. Vet. Sci. 70:169–173.
20- Khosravinia, H. (2006) Effect of oiling and antimicrobial spray of litter performance of broiler chicken reared on leaves and corn cob bedding materials under heat stress condition. Asian. Australian. J. Anim. Sci. 19(11):35-42.
21- Lacy, M.P. (1991) Litter quality and broiler performance. The University of Georgia College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Cooperative Extention Service, Leaflet, 426.
22- Lien, R.J., Conner, D. E. and Bilgili, S.F. (1992) The use of recycled paper chips as litter material for rearing broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 71:81–87.
23- Lien, R.J., Hess, J.B., Conner, D.E., Wood, C.W. and Shelby,
R.A. (1998) Peanut hulls as a litter source for broiler breeder
replacement pullets. Poult. Sci. 77:41-46.
24- Malone, G.W., Allen, P.H., Chaloupka, G.W. and Ritter, W.F. (1982) Recycled paper products as broiler litter. Poult. Sci. 61:2116-2165.
25- Maurice, D.V., Lightsey, S.E., Hamrick, E. and Cox, J. (1998) Alum sludge and zeolite as component of broiler litter. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:263-267.
26- McWard, G.E. and Taylor, D.R. (2000) Acidified clay litter amendment. J. Appl. Poultry. Res. 9:518-529. 
27- Moore, P. A., Haggard, B.E., Daniel, T.C., Edwards, D.R.,
Shreve, B.R. and Sauer, T.J. (1997) Demonstration of nutri t management for poultry litter using alum precipitation of soluble Phosphorus. Final Report to U.S. EPA for Federal Assistance Project No. 9006749920.
28- Moore, P.A., Daniel, T.C. and Edwards, D.R. (1999) Reducing phosphorus runoff and improving poultry production with alum. Poult. Sci. 78:692–698.
29- Moore, P.A., Daniel, T.C., Edwards, D.R. (2000) Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia loss from poultry manure with aluminum sulfate. J. Environ. Qual. 29:37–49.
30- Moore, P.A., Daniel, T.C., Edwards, D.R. and Miller, D.M. (1995) Effect of chemical amendments on ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. J. Environ. Qual. 24:293–300.
31- Moore, P.A., Huff, W.E., Daniel, T.C. Edwards, D.R. and Miller, D.M. (1996) Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. Poult. Sci. 75(3):315–320.
32- Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C.A.P., Saenmahayak, B., Hess, J.B. and Bilgili, S.F. (2007) Efficacy of a litter amendment to reduce pododermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16:255- 261.
33- Nagaraja, K.V. (1982) Ammonia caused E. coli congestion. Feedstuffs. 54(11):14.
34- Nakaue, H.S., Koelliker, J.K. and Pierson, M.L. (1980) Studies with clinoptilolite in poultry 2. Effect of feeding broilers and the direct application of clinoptilolite (zeolite) on clean and re-used broiler litter on broiler performance and house environment. Poult. Sci. 60:1221–1228.
35- Oyetunde, O.O.F., Thomson, R.G. and Carlson, H.C. (1978) Aerosol exposure of ammonia, dust and Escherichia coli in broiler chickens. Canadian Vet. J. 19:187-193.
36- Parkhurst, C.R., Hamilton, P.B., and Baughman, G.R. (1974) The use of volatile fatty acids for the control of microorganisms in pine sawdust litter. Poult. Sci. 53:801-806.
37- Peacock, C.G., Brewer, R.N., Flood, Jr, C.A. Jr., and Koon, J.L. (1984) Effect of litter on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 63 (Suppl. 1):163. (Abstr.).
38- Reece, F.N., Bates, B.J. and Lott, B.D. (1979) Ammonia control in broiler houses. Poult. Sci. 58:754–760.
39- Reece, F.N., Lott, B.D. and Deaton, J.W. (1980) Ammonia in the atmospheric during brooding affects performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 59(3):486-488.
40- Ritz, C.W., Fairchild, B.D. and Lacy, M.P. (2004) Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: a review. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13:684-692.
41- Ruiz, V., Ruiz, D., Gernat, A.G., Grimes, G.L., Murillo, J.G., Wineland, M.J., Anderson, K.E. and Maguire, R.O. (2008) The effect of quicklime (CaO) on litter condition and broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 87:823–827.
42- Ruszler, P.L. and Carson, J.R. (1968) Physical and biological evaluation of five litter materials. Poult. Sci. 41:249-254.
43- SAS Institute. INC. (1996) SAS User’s Guied: Statistics, Version 6.12. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc.
44- Shah, S., Westerman, P. and Parsons, J. (2006) Poultry litter amendments. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A & T University State. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 2/06-JL/SSS.
45- Wilis, W.L., Murray, C. and Talbott, C. (1997) Evaluation of leaves as a litter material. Poult. Sci. 76:1138–1140.
تحقیقات دامپزشکی و فرآورده‌های بیولوژیک
دوره 24، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
پیاپی 90
فروردین 1390
صفحه 23-32

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 03 اردیبهشت 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 03 اردیبهشت 1394

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار